TigerDirect
BandusMall
Add BandusMall to your FavoritesMake BandusMall Your Start Page


Bandus Computer Center

CD/DVD Drives





Reviews

Maximum PC Optical Drives RSS Feed
used for category lists, takes arguments

  • Plextor PX-850SA
    Last month we reviewed our first 22x DVD burner, Samsung?s SH-S223; this month, Plextor presents us with a challenger in the form of the PX-850SA?a similarly spec?d drive that rises to the occasion in some respects, but falls short in others. Like Samsung?s new burner, the PX-850SA boasts an industry-leading 22x speed rating for DVD+/-R media. It lacks, however, the Samsung?s over-speed feature, which helped that drive eke out a 4:46 (min:sec) Lab record when writing 4.38GB of data to a single-layer DVD+R disc. By comparison, the Plextor took 5:36, never breaching the 16x speed limit imposed by our Verbatim media. The difference between the two drives? performance with double-layer media was more expected. After all, Plextor?s PX-850SA is rated at just 8x when writing to DVD+/- DL, compared to the Samsung drive?s rating of 16x. In practical terms, this means Plextor?s drive took 16:33 to fill an 8GB disc versus the Samsung drive?s time of 13:13. But the Plextor PX-850SA did have its triumphs. As a new addition to our optical drive benchmarks, we test a drive?s ability to rip the contents of a double-layer DVD to a hard drive. The PX-850SA had an average rip time of 10:43, while Samsung?s drive was about 50 percent slower, with an average rip time of 15:26. We must note that Samsung?s drive redeemed its ripping reputation?and then some?with a firmware hack, but Plextor?s PX-850SA gets props for being the faster drive out of the box and for being competitive at rips against a host of other drives. The Plexy also gets props for its good looks. The drive?s stylish, shiny faceplate stands out against the generic facades of its peers. The PX-850SA further differentiates itself by coming bundled with Roxio Creator 10 CE as opposed to Nero?s package of DVD playing and burning apps, although the two suites are pretty comparable. In the end, we?re talking about a solid-performing drive, but the PX-850SA still takes a backseat to Samsung?s SH-S223.
  • Samsung SH-S223
    We?ll admit we?ve been perfectly content with Samsung?s SH-S203 DVD burner for more than a year. Once we were writing 4.38GB of data to a disc in five minutes flat, we were feeling pretty satisfied with the state of DVD technology. Nevertheless, we?re not about to turn our nose up at a performance increase. And that?s what Samsung?s latest DVD burner, the SH-S223, offers. As you might have guessed from the name, the SH-S223 represents a jump from 20x to 22x DVD+/-R burn speeds. In our tests, this effectively shaved 12 seconds off the time it took to fill a single-layer DVD+R disc. The SH-S223 took 4:46 (min:sec) compared with the SH-S203?s flat 5:00. In both cases, we used 16x media, the fastest-rated media that?s readily available. And in both cases, the drives? ?over-speed? feature enabled them to burn data at higher than rated speeds. In the course of its write, the SH-S223 steadily climbed from a starting speed of 8.38x to 20.7x. Besides the boost in DVD+/-R speeds, however, the SH-S223 has identical speed ratings to its predecessor for all other types of media. In our DVD+R DL write test, the SH-S223?s 16x rating for that media amounted to a write time of 13:13 using 8x media, a mere three seconds slower than the SH-S203. Again, the SH-S223?s over-speed feature kicked in, with a good portion of the burn occurring at 10x speed. The SH-S223 is rated at 8x for DVD+RW and 6x for DVD-RW. We tested the drive with DVD-RW media rated at 4x. This time, rather than burning beyond the disc?s speed rating, the SH-S223 stuck to it, maintaining a 4x speed throughout and writing 4.38GB to the rewriteable disc in 14:56. This isn?t all that surprising, as drives typically perform much more conservatively with rewriteable media, given its greater propensity for write errors. Like the SH-S203 before it, the SH-S223 connects to a PC using a SATA interface and comes bundled with a host of Nero apps. While we see no need to graduate from a 20x DVD burner?particularly the SH-S203?to the SH-S223, this is the drive to get if you?re currently using anything less than an 18x model.
  • Sony BWU 300S Blu-Ray Burner
    For more than a year, LG has been sitting pretty with the only 6x Blu-ray burner available for retail, but now that Sony?s BWU 300S offers 8x BD-R write speeds, LG?s supremacy has come to an end. Sort of. The 300S is uncommonly fast?given the right circumstances. The drive managed to fill a 25GB BD-R disc with data in a blistering 13:56 (min:sec), compared with the LG GBW-H20L?s time of 22:16, but only when the drive was fed manufacturer-recommended Panasonic 6x media. And good luck finding that?our online search for the media was fruitless. When using more common 4x media, the 300S stuck closely to that speed rating, taking 22:56 to complete the same task. This is an interesting point of comparison since LG?s drive is tuned to overburn 4x BD-R media at 6x speeds, which seems like a really nifty feat, until you see that its overall average speed remains 4x. More impressive is the fact that the LG drive can perform the exact same trick with 2x BD-R media. But we digress. Like the rest of the competition, the 300S is rated at 2x for rewriteable BD media, which resulted in a 45:20 time to fill a 25GB BD-RE disc, almost six minutes slower than LG?s drive. In our DVD+R burn tests, the two drives, which both feature 16x write ratings, ran neck and neck. The 300S took 5:49 to write 4.38GB of data to a single-layer disc, while the GBW-H20L took 5:43. We?ll give Sony props for making BD-R writes truly speedy, but our enthusiasm is tempered by the unavailability of the Panasonic 6x media that makes those speeds possible. What?s more, even when using an equally rare 6x TDK disc, Sony?s drive wouldn?t overburn to its maximum 8x ability. It?s that particular. So in real-world terms we?re really looking at a drive that performs about the same, or marginally worse, than LG?s GBW-H20L, yet costs $100 more. Even the bundled Men in Black BD disc doesn?t justify that premium. Heck, we?re not convinced that Blu-ray is worth even the lower price.
  • LG BE06 External Blu-Ray Burner
    We expected LG?s new 6x external Blu-ray burner to perform similarly to the company?s GBW-H20L internal offering, what with the two having identical read/write speed ratings, but we were wrong. The external drive is a bigger, more expensive letdown. Like the GBW-H20L, the BE06 external model boasts an industry-leading 6x BD-R write rating. And here the latter performed accordingly, writing 22GB of data to a single-layer BD-R disc in a brisk 22:43 (min:sec). In BD-RE writes, however, the BE06 faltered?badly. Boasting the same 2x rating for rewriteable media as the GBW-H20L, the BE06 took more than twice as long as that drive to write 22GB of data to a BD-RE disc?a full hour and 28 minutes! That?s actually slower than just about any Blu-ray burner we?ve tested in recent memory. Not good. The BE06 redeemed itself with DVD-R writes. The drive is rated at 16x and was able to write 4.38GB to a single-layer disc in 5:42?a second faster than the LG GBW-H20L. The drives were as closely matched on DVD-R reads. While there?s something to be said for the convenience of an external drive with a USB 2.0 interface, this is offset by the BE06?s gargantuan size. The enclosure is nearly 3 inches longer and an inch wider than its internal brethren?and $100 more expensive. Blu-ray is a tough enough sell as it is without tacking on this drive?s compromises. We?re unimpressed.
  • LG GBW-H20L
    When we reviewed LG?s GGW-H20L Blu-ray burner in December 2007 we applauded its superior BD-R write speeds and ability to also read HD DVD media. Now that the latter feature is irrelevant, we welcome LG?s new GBW-H20L. It boasts all the same DVD and BD read and write specs as its predecessor, sans the HD DVD reader?and comes with a healthy price cut. LG makes next-gen optical seem like a viable option. LG remains the only manufacturer offering 6x write speeds for BD-R media, and it?s a notable distinction. Even when burning to 2x media, LG?s drives are far speedier than the 4x competition at filling a BD-R disc with 22.5GB of data?taking just over 20 minutes (the 4x Lite On drive we reviewed last month took 48 minutes to complete that task!). LG?s BD burner offers a 16x DVD+R write rating. While it?s shy of the 20x rating you?ll find on top-end dedicated DVD drives, we?re satisfied with the real-world results. When writing 4.38GB of data to a singled-layer DVD+R disc, LG?s GBW-H20L took 5:43 (min:sec), compared with the Lab record time of 5:00 set by Samsung?s SH-S203 DVD drive. Most Blu-ray burners we?ve reviewed have capped DVD+R speeds at 8x or 12x, including the Lite On drive reviewed last month, which took 7:09 to fill a single-layer DVD. While LG?s previous GGW-H20L wins the majority of our benchmarks, the GBW-H20L comes well within spitting distance of that drive. And at $280, the GBW-H20L is almost $200 less than its predecessor. We like that.
  • Lite On 4x Blu-ray Triple Writer DH-4B1S
    Lite On?s new drive may sport a faster 4x BD-R write rating, but it performs worse than its 2x kin. It doesn?t matter a lick to us that Blu-ray has prevailed in the high-def format war if the hardware remains expensive and uninspiring. We have to admit, we thought the tide was turning when we reviewed LG?s GGW-H20L Blu-ray burner back in December. That drive represented a dramatic price drop (falling to $500 from its predecessor?s $1,200 price tag in a matter of months?and now settled at $400 MSRP), and its 6x rating for BD-R media resulted in burn times we could actually live with (22.5GB in a little over 20 minutes). Sadly, Lite On has not followed LG?s lead. True, the company?s latest Blu-ray burner is cheaper than the Lite On LH-2B1S we reviewed in July 2007 ($450 vs. $600) and has a faster BD-R write rating (4x vs. 2x), but we?re not the least bit moved by these changes. For starters, the new DH-4B1S is still more expensive than the aforementioned LG GGW-H20L, and its ?improved? BD-R rating has actually made burning to that media slower! It took us 48:00 (min:sec) to burn 22.5GB to a single-layer disc. Certain this was a mistake, we ran the test again?for a time of 48:14! (With the 2x Lite On drive, this very task took just 46:14.) The DH-4B1S was actually faster burning to BD-RE media?where it?s rated at just 2x?writing 22.5GB to a rewriteable disc in 46:12. With such pathetic Blu-ray performance, it might seem moot to discuss the DH-4B1S?s other attributes, such as DVD burn times, but here you have it: The drive is rated at 12x for DVD+R single-layer discs; in our tests, it wrote 4.38GB of data to that media in 7:09 (min:sec). That?s a decent time, but LG?s GGW-H20L, which is rated at 16x, took just 5:40 to complete this task. Like all the Blu-ray burners we?ve ever tested, the DH-4B1S comes bundled with a collection of CyberLink applications for backup, copying, playback, and authoring chores. We can?t hold the drive responsible, but we?d appreciate CyberLink?s software more if it weren?t so twitchy. Aesthetically, the drive is pretty standard, although it does sport an LED strip across its front that signifies drive operation and whether it?s working with CD, DVD, or BD media. The DH-4B1S smartly sports a SATA interface. We always expect technology to progress by leaps and bounds, but a drive such as this makes us feel like Blu-ray is at a standstill.
  • Lite-On 20A4PU EZ-Dub Optical Drive
    One of the most obvious differences between an external optical drive and its internal brethren is in appearance. A device that?s going to sit out in the open for anyone to see, after all, has to look the part. Lite-On?s latest EZ-Dub optical drive accomplishes this with a fashionable white and black aesthetic that would surely do Apple proud. It?s an update from the more staid look of the previous EZ-Dub model, which was also nearly two inches longer and a half-inch taller. As with the older model, this EZ-Dub comes with a stand, so you can set the drive on its side to save desktop space. Another distinction of external drives is convenience. The EZ-Dub connects to a PC via USB and is ready to go with you anywhere. Lite-On also equips the drive with two touch-sensitive buttons to make common optical chores easier: a Dub button for disc-to-disc copies and a File button for backing up files to a disc. Pressing the button automatically launches the bundled EZ-Dub software, and then it?s just a couple steps to completing the aforementioned tasks. In the end, it saves a bit of time, but these tasks aren?t all that laborious when you use the traditional means: The drive also comes bundled with the Nero 7 Essentials package. Of course, what should matter most about any optical drive is its performance. The EZ-Dub is rated for 20x DVD+R write speeds, just like the Samsung SH-S203 that we?ve been recommending for many months. But Lite-On?s drive took a full minute longer than Samsung?s to write 4.38GB to a single-layer DVD+R (6 minutes vs. 5 minutes). And when writing to a double-layer disc, Lite-On?s drive took 17:56 (min:sec) to Samsung?s 13:10. Still, these scores are solid, if not stellar?and if what you?re after is an external drive solution, Lite-On?s EZ-Dub is a credible choice.
  • LG Super Multi Blue GGW-H20LI
    It?s no surprise that high-def optical drives are getting less expensive while their specs improve?that?s the trajectory of all emergent technologies?but we are still taken aback by the dramatic strides LG?s GGW-H20LI represents. Just a few months ago, in our September issue, we reviewed this drive?s predecessor, the GGW-H10NI, and not only is its follow-up better in every respect, it?s half the price! Granted, at $1,200 the earlier model was priced out of the stratosphere?consumers paid a premium for its unique ability to read both HD DVD and Blu-ray media (while writing to just the latter). The GGW-H20LI also offers this convenience. Plus, it offers a welcome speed increase for Blu-ray burns. Rated at 6x for BD-R media, the GGW-H20LI took 21:23 (min:sec) to write 22.5GB to a single-layer disc in our tests. That?s a 6-minute savings over this drive?s 4x predecessor. (Frankly, we were expecting to see more savings, since the 4x drive nearly halved the times of its 2x competitors, but we?ll take what we can get.) We saved just about 6 minutes when writing to rewriteable media as well, with the GGW-H20LI filling a single-layer BD-RE disc in 39:38. But really, given the high cost of Blu-ray media ($12 to $15 per single-layer disc), not to mention the still-lengthy burn times, this drive?s DVD performance matters as much or more to most users. Rated at 16x, the GGW-H20LI took 5:40 (min:sec) to fill a single-layer DVD+R, while its predecessor took more than 10 minutes. Even dedicated DVD burners aren?t much faster?the Samsung SH-S203B, our pick for ?Best of the Best? (see page 46)?took 5 minutes to complete this task. Its reign might not last long, but for now the GGW-H20LI is the fastest, most versatile high-def optical burner available and made all the more attractive by its handsome fa硤e and SATA interface.


Top of Page
BandusMall